by Alys Drake
When there is a tragedy, you have the terrible responsibility to inform the public. Please don’t interview witnesses who are children. I don’t care if their parents give permission. The parents are probably too traumatized to make a rational decision as well. What good comes from it? These babies are already damaged and you want to put their reactions on the air? For what?
Not for me. I immediately turn off any program that shows it. Which has meant I haven’t watched much of the coverage for this latest mass shooting.
I think it’s lazy reporting at best and intrusive and a violation at it’s worst. Instead, find adults who can tell you what it was like for the children but don’t interview the children themselves.
Find stories of compassion and heroics and focus on them. Please don’t make us relive the horror over and over. We have a responsibility to our children to help them make sense of the senseless. As the media, you have the responsibility to report the news with accuracy and compassion.
God bless and guide the parents of the dead. God bless and guide the law enforcement community who must identify the dead. And God bless and guide the media charged to inform the public.
When I was young, I would love to listen to the radio. I was star struck by the disk jockeys and can remember the thrill of finding a distant signal from St. Louis or Chicago on the AM dial. This was before FM radio, before MTV, before YouTube, satellite radio or iTunes.
Today, my children could not care less about radio nor can they understand the thrill of tuning in a distant radio signal. After all, they can find any music they want online. If they want to know what’s happening in Chicago, they can Google it.
Radio continues to struggle. I know it and I hate it. Those who are still on-air on local radio live a precarious life. Corporations, of course, want a profit run radio. I don’t deny them that. They rely on shares, ratings, books, whatever it’s called, to prove to advertisers that their station is the most popular in one demographic or the other. I understand the need for measurement.
However, these corporations are forgetting something very important. They are forgetting about the one thing that will save local radio from the onslaught of internet radio and satellite radio: engagement with the community. In Memphis, there is a great radio station that appeared to have the corporate backing to be engaged with the community. All of the on-air talent is encouraged to use social media to connect with listeners and they do it well. They have an active Twitter account and Facebook fan page with great engagement in both platforms.
This station embraces being local and supports local events. Their talent is seen at all types of events, even events that the station is not a direct sponsor. It’s been great to see them embrace the community and leverage social media in that engagement, as I believe that this increases loyalty to the station.
But last week, they made a big mistake.
They fired, without warning, an eighteen-year veteran of local radio and one half of their popular morning show. It was shocking. Why? All she could say was the station was going in a different direction and it didn’t include her.
The next morning’s show was painful to listen to without her. Her on-air partner could say nothing about her absence but anyone who listened could hear the pain in his voice. After all, he had been fired from another station owned by this same group as part of a three-person morning team some years before. She was one of those left behind that time.
You would like to think the corporate guys would have learned the first time, but no.
So today, I am upset and disappointed. Not only because of who was fired, but the way it was done.
There is still no official statement from the station. All traces of her are gone from the website. They removed negative comments to their Facebook fan page and barred those who posted in protest from future comments. Not smart. You already have an upset fan base and you make them even more upset by banning them from the community and telling them nothing?
Community. That is what will draw listeners to local radio. Community is not shares. Community is not ratings or books. Community is made up of people and people listen to the radio. People like knowing she has two kids in local schools and he has one in college. People grieve when his mother dies. People celebrate when another personality announces a marriage or a baby. This is not how you treat your community.
I still love radio. I love the people on radio and I will continue to support them, even when those in charge of the future of the station can’t see what’s right in front of their faces.
I’m not one to make New Year resolutions. I never thought they served much purpose. Why resolve to do things in January that I’ve wanted to do all along during the year?
But this year, I do have one thought on my mind. Relationships. This started a few weeks ago after a sermon preached by Rev. Shane Stanford when he talked about encounters. He was sharing with the congregation about the importance of even the smallest encounter with another person. How it can lead to something much more significant down the road.
Ever since, this thought has been on my mind. “Am I paying enough attention to the encounters of my life?”
Sadly, the answer is no. So, for 2012, I still won’t make a resolution. But I will start being more intentional in my relationships with others.
There are so many people I come in contact with daily. Not just my family, co-workers, and clients. But vendors, reporters, sales reps, all these people mean something, not just to me but to God as well. When our lives intersect, what is my response? How should I deal with the encounter?
I know I’m called to pay closer attention but where that leads, I’m not sure. But I’m looking forward to finding out.